Edan Leshem vs Goran Markovic, Ramat HaSharon 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 30 Nov

Final

Edan Leshem

WinnerRank #1953

Leshem won in 2 sets · 52m

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–2

Goran Markovic

LostRank #2004

Venue

Israel Tennis Center, Ramat HaSharon

Ramat Hasharon, ISR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

55 m

Low

Match stats

52m

2Aces1

1Double faults4

28Service points won19

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Leshem

0Markovic

1 meeting

Ramat HaSharonRound of 16 · 30 Nov 2017HardThis match
Edan Leshem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Goran Markovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Edan Leshem vs Goran Markovic, Ramat HaSharon 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research