Roberto Cid Subervi vs William Grant, Pensacola 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Sat 18 Nov

Final

Roberto Cid Subervi

WinnerRank #1334

Subervi won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 12–6

Set 26–2

Set 36–1

William Grant

LostRank #886

Venue

Roger Scott Tennis Center

Pensacola, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

25 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

20 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Subervi

0Grant

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

PensacolaQuarterfinal · 18 Nov 2017ClayThis match
Roberto Cid Subervi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
William Grant
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 1
Wesley ChapelRound of 32 · 23 Jan 2024Hard
Roberto Cid Subervi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
William Grant
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Roberto Cid Subervi vs William Grant, Pensacola 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research