Mate Delic vs Riccardo Bonadio, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 17 Nov

Final

Mate Delic

LostRank #595

Bonadio won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–7⁵

Riccardo Bonadio

WinnerRank #1035

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 30m

4Aces7

0Double faults1

46Service points won48

11Service games played11

9Service games won10

11Return games played11

5/771%Break points saved50%1/2

1/250%Break points converted29%2/7

Head to head

0Delic

1Bonadio

1 meeting

AntalyaQuarterfinal · 17 Nov 2017ClayThis match
Riccardo Bonadio
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Mate Delic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mate Delic vs Riccardo Bonadio, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research