Jeroen Vanneste vs Leny Mitjana, Meshref 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 10 Nov

Final

Jeroen Vanneste

LostRank #1663

Mitjana won in 2 sets · 1h 51m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 25–7

Leny Mitjana

WinnerRank #1693

Venue

Kuwait National Tennis Center

Meshref, KUW· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

12 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 51m

3Aces0

6Double faults6

39Service points won43

11Service games played11

7Service games won9

11Return games played11

2/633%Break points saved60%3/5

2/540%Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Vanneste

1Mitjana

1 meeting

MeshrefQuarterfinal · 10 Nov 2017HardThis match
Leny Mitjana
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Jeroen Vanneste
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jeroen Vanneste vs Leny Mitjana, Meshref 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research