Daniel Appelgren vs Zdenek Kolar, Tartu 2017, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Carpet · Fri 27 Oct

Final

Daniel Appelgren

LostRank #1321

Kolar won in 3 sets · 2h 55m

1–2

Set 17–6³

Set 24–6

Set 34–6

Zdenek Kolar

WinnerRank #206

Venue

Tähtvere Tennis Club and tennis school

Tartu, EST· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

63 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 55m

0Aces13

3Double faults5

68Service points won68

16Service games played16

11Service games won13

16Return games played16

5/1050%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted50%5/10

Head to head

0Appelgren

1Kolar

1 meeting

TartuSemifinal · 27 Oct 2017CarpetThis match
Zdenek Kolar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Daniel Appelgren
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Appelgren vs Zdenek Kolar, Tartu 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research