Alexis Canter vs Igor Smilansky, Ashkelon 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 18 Oct

Final

Alexis Canter

LostRank #2241

Smilansky won in 2 sets · 1h 15m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 23–6

Igor Smilansky

WinnerRank #1494

Venue

Ashkelon Tennis Center

Ashkelon, ISR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

35 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 15m

3Aces5

0Double faults4

27Service points won38

9Service games played9

6Service games won9

9Return games played9

0/30%Break points saved100%2/2

0/20%Break points converted100%3/3

Head to head

0Canter

1Smilansky

1 meeting

AshkelonRound of 16 · 18 Oct 2017HardThis match
Igor Smilansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Alexis Canter
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Alexis Canter vs Igor Smilansky, Ashkelon 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research