Marinko Matosevic vs Marius Copil, Kaohsiung Challenger 2017, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 7 Oct

Final

Marinko Matosevic

LostRank #509

Copil won in 2 sets · 1h 23m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 26–7⁵

Marius Copil

WinnerRank #1021

Venue

Kaohsiung Arena

Kaohsiung, TPE· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

8 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 23m

0Aces14

0Double faults4

37Service points won48

10Service games played10

8Service games won10

10Return games played10

1/333%Break points saved100%3/3

0/30%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

0Matosevic

1Copil

1 meeting

Kaohsiung ChallengerSemifinal · 7 Oct 2017HardThis match
Marius Copil
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Marinko Matosevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marinko Matosevic vs Marius Copil, Kaohsiung Challenger 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research