Steve Darcis vs Nick Kyrgios, Beijing 2017, Quarterfinal

ATP 500 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 6 Oct

Final · Retired

Steve Darcis

LostRank #7565.3718%

Kyrgios won · Retired · 30m

0–1

Set 10–6

Set 20–3

Nick Kyrgios

WinnerRank #9171.2082%

Venue

National Tennis Center

Beijing, CHN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

3.6vs last year

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

68%

Moderate

Temperature

22°C

Mild

Altitude

46 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

30m

0Aces12

3Double faults2

5Service points won21

4Service games played5

0Service games won5

5Return games played4

2/633%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Darcis

1Kyrgios

1 meeting

BeijingQuarterfinal · 6 Oct 2017HardThis match
Nick Kyrgios
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3
Steve Darcis
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Steve Darcis · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Steve Darcis vs Nick Kyrgios, Beijing 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research