Florent Diep vs Jules Okala, Hammamet 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 8 Sept

Final

Florent Diep

LostRank #1815

Okala won in 2 sets · 1h 16m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 22–6

Jules Okala

WinnerRank #1885

Venue

Hotel Sentido Phenicia

Hammamet, TUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 16m

0Aces1

1Double faults6

18Service points won32

7Service games played8

2Service games won7

8Return games played7

2/729%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted71%5/7

Head to head

0Diep

1Okala

1 meeting

HammametQuarterfinal · 8 Sept 2017ClayThis match
Jules Okala
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Florent Diep
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Florent Diep vs Jules Okala, Hammamet 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research