Pascal Meis vs Federico Maccari, Trieste 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 7 Sept

Final

Pascal Meis

WinnerRank #1386

Meis won in 2 sets · 1h 15m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–2

Federico Maccari

LostRank #1394

Venue

Tennis Club Triestino

Trieste, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

27 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

361 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 15m

6Aces1

2Double faults9

33Service points won26

8Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played8

0/0Break points saved50%4/8

4/850%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Meis

0Maccari

1 meeting

TriesteQuarterfinal · 7 Sept 2017ClayThis match
Pascal Meis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Federico Maccari
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pascal Meis vs Federico Maccari, Trieste 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research