Matteo Viola vs Baptiste Crepatte, Sion 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 1 Sept

Final

Matteo Viola

WinnerRank #1289

Viola won in 2 sets · 1h 29m

2–0

Set 17–5

Set 26–2

Baptiste Crepatte

LostRank #1631

Venue

Tennis Club de Valère

Sion, SUI· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

491 m

Moderate

Match stats

1h 29m

0Aces2

5Double faults2

38Service points won33

10Service games played10

8Service games won5

10Return games played10

5/771%Break points saved29%2/7

5/771%Break points converted29%2/7

Head to head

1Viola

0Crepatte

1 meeting

SionQuarterfinal · 1 Sept 2017ClayThis match
Matteo Viola
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Baptiste Crepatte
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matteo Viola vs Baptiste Crepatte, Sion 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research