Javier Marti vs Timur Kiyamov, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 1 Sept

Final

Javier Marti

WinnerRank #1311

Marti won in 2 sets · 1h 0m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Timur Kiyamov

LostRank #1720

Venue

Starlight Resort Hotel Tennis Center

Kızılağaç, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

12 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 0m

1Aces0

0Double faults5

28Service points won16

7Service games played6

7Service games won1

6Return games played7

0/0Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Marti

0Kiyamov

1 meeting

AntalyaQuarterfinal · 1 Sept 2017ClayThis match
Javier Marti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Timur Kiyamov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Javier Marti vs Timur Kiyamov, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research