Adrian Bodmer vs Matthias Haim, Ueberlingen 2017, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 26 Aug

Final

Adrian Bodmer

WinnerRank #1170

Bodmer won in 2 sets · 1h 32m

2–0

Set 17–6³

Set 27–6⁵

Matthias Haim

LostRank #1612

Venue

TC Überlingen

Überlingen, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

399 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 32m

8Aces8

5Double faults1

60Service points won56

12Service games played12

12Service games won12

12Return games played12

1/1100%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

1Bodmer

0Haim

1 meeting

UeberlingenSemifinal · 26 Aug 2017ClayThis match
Adrian Bodmer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Matthias Haim
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Adrian Bodmer vs Matthias Haim, Ueberlingen 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research