Sho Katayama vs Tung Lin Wu, Nonthaburi 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Tue 15 Aug

Final

Sho Katayama

WinnerRank #1514

Katayama won in 2 sets · 58m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–1

Tung Lin Wu

LostRank #353

Venue

LTAT National Tennis Development Center

Nonthaburi, THA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Match stats

58m

4Aces6

0Double faults0

31Service points won21

8Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played8

2/367%Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted33%1/3

Head to head

1Katayama

0Wu

1 meeting

NonthaburiRound of 16 · 15 Aug 2017HardThis match
Sho Katayama
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tung Lin Wu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sho Katayama vs Tung Lin Wu, Nonthaburi 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research