Tomislav Brkic vs Jeremy Jahn, Cornaiano 2017, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Fri 11 Aug

Final

Tomislav Brkic

WinnerRank #1195

Brkic won in 3 sets · 2h 14m

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 23–6

Set 36–4

Jeremy Jahn

LostRank #1054

Venue

Tenniszentrum Rungg

Bolzano, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

506 m

Moderate

Match stats

2h 14m

6Aces3

3Double faults4

56Service points won61

14Service games played15

12Service games won12

15Return games played14

2/450%Break points saved75%9/12

3/1225%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

1Brkic

0Jahn

1 meeting

CornaianoSemifinal · 11 Aug 2017ClayThis match
Tomislav Brkic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Jeremy Jahn
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tomislav Brkic vs Jeremy Jahn, Cornaiano 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research