Filip Horansky vs Tomas Liska, Bratislava 2017, Quarterfinal

Final

Filip Horansky

WinnerATP: 1499

Horansky won in 2 sets · 1h 32m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Tomas Liska

LostATP: 1205

TK Slávia Agrofert STUBratislava, SVK

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

94.1Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

33°CHot

28km/hModerate

66%Moderate

138mLow

Match stats

1h 32m

2Aces0

4Double faults3

37Service points won26

10Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played10

7/1070%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted30%3/10

Head to head

2Horansky

0Liska

2 meetings

BratislavaQuarterfinal · 11 Aug 2017ClayThis match
Filip Horansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Liska
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Poprad TatryQualifying R2 · 17 Jun 2017Clay
Filip Horansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Liska
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Filip Horansky vs Tomas Liska, Bratislava 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research