Sho Katayama vs Francis Casey Alcantara, Nonthaburi 2017, Round of 16

Final · Retired

Sho Katayama

WinnerATP: 1531

Katayama won · Retired · 1h 28m

1–1

Set 16–7⁶

Set 26–1

Set 32–0

Francis Casey Alcantara

LostATP: 1742

LTAT National Tennis Development CenterNonthaburi, THA

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

104.7Fast

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

30°CWarm

11km/hLight

85%Very humid

6mSea level

Match stats

1h 28m

3Aces2

0Double faults2

41Service points won38

10Service games played11

8Service games won5

11Return games played10

4/667%Break points saved25%2/8

6/875%Break points converted33%2/6

Head to head

1Katayama

0Alcantara

1 meeting

NonthaburiRound of 16 · 8 Aug 2017HardThis match
Sho Katayama
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
Francis Casey Alcantara
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 0
Francis Casey Alcantara · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sho Katayama vs Francis Casey Alcantara, Nonthaburi 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research