Gabriel Petit vs Evan Furness, Riga 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 3 Aug

Final

Gabriel Petit

LostRank #1384

Furness won in 2 sets · 54m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 20–6

Evan Furness

WinnerRank #1241

Venue

SMScredit.lv Tenisa centrs, now Rimi tennis center

Riga, LAT· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

11 m

Sea level

Match stats

54m

0Aces5

6Double faults2

19Service points won26

7Service games played7

1Service games won6

7Return games played7

0/60%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted100%6/6

Head to head

0Petit

1Furness

1 meeting

RigaQuarterfinal · 3 Aug 2017ClayThis match
Evan Furness
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gabriel Petit
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Gabriel Petit vs Evan Furness, Riga 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research