Abdullah Maqdas vs Javier Marti, Porto 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 3 Aug

Final

Abdullah Maqdas

LostRank #1655

Marti won in 2 sets · 1h 7m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 22–6

Javier Marti

WinnerRank #1311

Venue

Clube de Ténis do Porto

Porto, POR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

84%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

133 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 7m

0Aces0

1Double faults0

16Service points won29

7Service games played8

2Service games won7

8Return games played7

1/617%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted83%5/6

Head to head

0Maqdas

1Marti

1 meeting

PortoRound of 16 · 3 Aug 2017ClayThis match
Javier Marti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Abdullah Maqdas
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Abdullah Maqdas vs Javier Marti, Porto 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research