Sarp Agabigun vs Igor Smilansky, Erzurum 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 3 Aug

Final

Sarp Agabigun

LostRank #1883

Smilansky won in 2 sets · 51m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 22–6

Igor Smilansky

WinnerRank #1494

Venue

Erzurum Olympic Park

Erzurum, TUR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

29%

Dry

Temperature

33°C

Hot

Altitude

1829 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Match stats

51m

2Aces7

4Double faults1

22Service points won32

7Service games played8

3Service games won8

8Return games played7

2/633%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Agabigun

1Smilansky

1 meeting

ErzurumQuarterfinal · 3 Aug 2017HardThis match
Igor Smilansky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sarp Agabigun
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sarp Agabigun vs Igor Smilansky, Erzurum 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research