Tobias Simon vs Omar Giacalone, Bolzano 2017, Round of 32

Final

Tobias Simon

WinnerATP: 1472

Simon won in 2 sets · 1h 34m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–3

Omar Giacalone

LostATP: 1230

Tennis Club Bolzano-BozenBolzano, ITA

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

3.796.7Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

34°CHot

6km/hLight

62%Moderate

269mLow

Match stats

1h 34m

11Aces2

0Double faults0

45Service points won39

10Service games played9

10Service games won7

9Return games played10

5/5100%Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted0%0/5

Head to head

1Simon

1Giacalone

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 0–1

BolzanoRound of 32 · 1 Aug 2017ClayThis match
Tobias Simon
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Omar Giacalone
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
DohaRound of 16 · 14 Mar 2018Hard
Omar Giacalone
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tobias Simon
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tobias Simon vs Omar Giacalone, Bolzano 2017, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research