Nikola Milojevic vs Issei Okamura, Tianjin 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 28 Jul

Final

Nikola Milojevic

WinnerRank #1425

Milojevic won in 2 sets · 1h 20m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Issei Okamura

LostRank #2223

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

80%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

—

No reading

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 20m

3Aces1

2Double faults0

29Service points won29

7Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played7

2/2100%Break points saved64%9/14

5/1436%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Milojevic

0Okamura

1 meeting

TianjinQuarterfinal · 28 Jul 2017HardThis match
Nikola Milojevic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Issei Okamura
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nikola Milojevic vs Issei Okamura, Tianjin 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research