Markus Eriksson vs Daniel Appelgren, Tampere Challenger 2017, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Clay · Sat 22 Jul

Final

Markus Eriksson

WinnerRank #12641.1087%

Eriksson won in 2 sets · 1h 6m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–0

Daniel Appelgren

LostRank #13217.2213%

Venue

Tampereen Tenniskeskus

Tampere, FIN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

79%

Humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

108 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 6m

1Aces2

1Double faults3

35Service points won25

8Service games played7

8Service games won3

7Return games played8

0/0Break points saved33%2/6

4/667%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

3Eriksson

0Appelgren

3 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 2–0

Tampere ChallengerQualifying R2 · 22 Jul 2017ClayThis match
Markus Eriksson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Appelgren
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
Sharm El SheikhRound of 32 · 15 Feb 2017Hard
Markus Eriksson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Daniel Appelgren
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 4
FalunRound of 16 · 2015Hard
Markus Eriksson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7
Daniel Appelgren
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Markus Eriksson vs Daniel Appelgren, Tampere Challenger 2017, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research