Matthias Haim vs Viktor Durasovic, Wels 2017, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Fri 21 Jul

Final

Matthias Haim

WinnerRank #1612

Haim won in 3 sets · 2h 5m

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 23–6

Set 37–5

Viktor Durasovic

LostRank #485

Venue

UNION Tennis Club Wels

Wels, AUT· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

318 m

Moderate

Match stats

2h 5m

11Aces5

1Double faults5

65Service points won64

15Service games played15

14Service games won13

15Return games played15

3/475%Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Haim

0Durasovic

1 meeting

WelsSemifinal · 21 Jul 2017ClayThis match
Matthias Haim
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Viktor Durasovic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matthias Haim vs Viktor Durasovic, Wels 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research