Caio Silva vs Yan Bondarevskiy, Telavi 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 20 Jul

Final

Caio Silva

WinnerRank #1960

Silva won in 3 sets · 1h 48m

2–1

Set 12–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–0

Yan Bondarevskiy

LostRank #1295

Venue

Telavi Tennis Club

Telavi, GEO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

747 m

Moderate

Match stats

1h 48m

0Aces0

5Double faults4

44Service points won39

12Service games played11

9Service games won6

11Return games played12

3/650%Break points saved55%6/11

5/1145%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Silva

0Bondarevskiy

1 meeting

TelaviRound of 16 · 20 Jul 2017ClayThis match
Caio Silva
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Yan Bondarevskiy
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Caio Silva vs Yan Bondarevskiy, Telavi 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research