Tomas Papik vs Michael Zhu, Sharm El Sheikh 2017, Quarterfinal

Final

Tomas Papik

WinnerATP: 1596

Papik won in 2 sets · 1h 1m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Michael Zhu

LostATP: 1071

SOHO Racket CenterSharm ElSheikh, EGY

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

104.9Fast

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

34°CHot

23km/hModerate

60%Moderate

36mSea level

Match stats

1h 1m

4Aces2

0Double faults2

31Service points won25

7Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played7

0/0Break points saved58%7/12

5/1242%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

2Papik

0Zhu

2 meetings

Sharm El SheikhQuarterfinal · 14 Jul 2017HardThis match
Tomas Papik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michael Zhu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Sharm El SheikhRound of 16 · 30 Mar 2017Hard
Tomas Papik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michael Zhu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tomas Papik vs Michael Zhu, Sharm El Sheikh 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research