Martins Podzus vs Tyler Lu, Shenzhen 2017, Round of 32

Final

Martins Podzus

LostATP: 1616

Lu won in 3 sets · 3h 10m

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 26–7⁴

Set 35–7

Tyler Lu

WinnerATP: 1510

Shenzhen Tennis CenterShenzhen, CHN

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

102.7Average

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

29°CWarm

18km/hGentle

89%Very humid

26mSea level

Match stats

3h 10m

5Aces3

5Double faults4

73Service points won76

17Service games played17

14Service games won14

17Return games played17

3/650%Break points saved73%8/11

3/1127%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Podzus

1Lu

2 meetings

ShenzhenRound of 32 · 5 Jul 2017HardThis match
Tyler Lu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 7
Martins Podzus
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 5
Kuala LumpurQuarterfinal · 26 Oct 2017Hard
Martins Podzus
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tyler Lu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Martins Podzus vs Tyler Lu, Shenzhen 2017, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research