Alexander Vasilenko vs Jordi Walder, Kamen 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 29 Jun

Final

Alexander Vasilenko

WinnerRank #1269

Vasilenko won in 2 sets · 1h 25m

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–2

Jordi Walder

LostRank #2064

Venue

VfL Tennis Kamen

Kamen, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

61 m

Low

Match stats

1h 25m

0Aces1

1Double faults2

37Service points won23

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

5/5100%Break points saved58%7/12

5/1242%Break points converted0%0/5

Head to head

1Vasilenko

0Walder

1 meeting

KamenRound of 16 · 29 Jun 2017ClayThis match
Alexander Vasilenko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jordi Walder
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Alexander Vasilenko vs Jordi Walder, Kamen 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research