Marc Sieber vs Nicolo Turchetti, Istanbul 2017, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 24 Jun

Final

Marc Sieber

WinnerRank #1609

Sieber won in 2 sets · 1h 22m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Nicolo Turchetti

LostRank #1735

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

—

No reading

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 22m

1Aces0

1Double faults3

29Service points won24

9Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played9

2/540%Break points saved40%4/10

6/1060%Break points converted60%3/5

Head to head

1Sieber

0Turchetti

1 meeting

IstanbulSemifinal · 24 Jun 2017ClayThis match
Marc Sieber
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nicolo Turchetti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marc Sieber vs Nicolo Turchetti, Istanbul 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research