Marc Sieber vs Hugo Dellien, Istanbul 2017, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 17 Jun

Final

Marc Sieber

LostRank #1609

Dellien won in 2 sets · 1h 35m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 21–6

Hugo Dellien

WinnerRank #119

Venue

Taç Sports Club Ataşehir

Istanbul, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

54%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

120 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 35m

0Aces0

2Double faults0

18Service points won38

8Service games played8

2Service games won6

8Return games played8

1/714%Break points saved75%6/8

2/825%Break points converted86%6/7

Head to head

0Sieber

1Dellien

1 meeting

IstanbulSemifinal · 17 Jun 2017ClayThis match
Hugo Dellien
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Marc Sieber
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marc Sieber vs Hugo Dellien, Istanbul 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research