Wil Spencer vs Jonathan Ho, Winston-Salem 2017, Round of 32

FUTURES · Round of 32 · Hard · Wed 14 Jun

Final

Wil Spencer

WinnerRank #1698

Spencer won in 2 sets · 1h 17m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Jonathan Ho

LostRank #2011

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 17m

2Aces0

1Double faults4

26Service points won19

7Service games played8

6Service games won2

8Return games played7

0/10%Break points saved25%2/8

6/875%Break points converted100%1/1

Head to head

1Spencer

0Ho

1 meeting

Winston-SalemRound of 32 · 14 Jun 2017HardThis match
Wil Spencer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jonathan Ho
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Wil Spencer vs Jonathan Ho, Winston-Salem 2017, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research