Sam Barry vs Mick Lescure, Kiryat Shmona 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 9 Jun

Final

Sam Barry

WinnerRank #1280

Barry won in 2 sets · 1h 49m

2–0

Set 17–6⁷

Set 26–0

Mick Lescure

LostRank #1413

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 49m

7Aces4

2Double faults6

38Service points won35

9Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played9

0/20%Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted100%2/2

Head to head

1Barry

0Lescure

1 meeting

Kiryat ShmonaQuarterfinal · 9 Jun 2017HardThis match
Sam Barry
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁹Set 2: 6
Mick Lescure
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁷Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sam Barry vs Mick Lescure, Kiryat Shmona 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research