Markus Eriksson vs Miki Jankovic, Prostejov Challenger 2017, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sun 4 Jun

Final

Markus Eriksson

WinnerRank #1264

Eriksson won in 2 sets · 1h 48m

2–0

Set 17–6¹

Set 27–6¹

Miki Jankovic

LostRank #1609

Venue

TK Agrofert Prostějov

Prostejov, CZE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

32 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

65%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

228 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 48m

7Aces5

3Double faults2

50Service points won40

12Service games played12

8Service games won8

12Return games played12

4/850%Break points saved43%3/7

4/757%Break points converted50%4/8

Head to head

2Eriksson

1Jankovic

3 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–1

Prostejov ChallengerQualifying R1 · 4 Jun 2017ClayThis match
Markus Eriksson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Miki Jankovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 6¹
HeraklionQuarterfinal · 1 Apr 2016Hard
Miki Jankovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁹
Markus Eriksson
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁷
HeraklionQuarterfinal · 25 Mar 2016Hard
Markus Eriksson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Miki Jankovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁵

Form and path

Markus Eriksson

No recent matches recorded.

Miki Jankovic0–1

ZalaegerszegClay

LRound of 32
Ljubomir Celebic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Miki Jankovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Markus Eriksson vs Miki Jankovic, Prostejov Challenger 2017, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research