Finn Tearney vs Cing Yang Meng, Lu'an 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 1 Jun

Final

Finn Tearney

WinnerRank #1816

Tearney won in 3 sets · 1h 49m

2–1

Set 13–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–2

Cing Yang Meng

LostRank #1996

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

33°C

Hot

Altitude

—

No reading

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 49m

5Aces1

8Double faults2

47Service points won49

13Service games played13

10Service games won8

13Return games played13

1/425%Break points saved62%8/13

5/1338%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

1Tearney

0Meng

1 meeting

Lu'anRound of 16 · 1 Jun 2017HardThis match
Finn Tearney
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Cing Yang Meng
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Finn Tearney vs Cing Yang Meng, Lu'an 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research