Jonas Merckx vs Elliot Benchetrit, Hammamet 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 1 Jun

Final

Jonas Merckx

LostRank #1434

Benchetrit won in 2 sets · 1h 19m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 21–6

Elliot Benchetrit

WinnerRank #1359

Venue

Hotel Sentido Phenicia

Hammamet, TUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 19m

1Aces0

9Double faults2

26Service points won35

8Service games played9

4Service games won8

9Return games played8

2/633%Break points saved50%1/2

1/250%Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Merckx

1Benchetrit

1 meeting

HammametRound of 16 · 1 Jun 2017ClayThis match
Elliot Benchetrit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jonas Merckx
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jonas Merckx vs Elliot Benchetrit, Hammamet 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research