Pedro Cachin vs Rafael Matos, Vic 2017, Final

FUTURES · Final · Clay · Sun 21 May

Final · Retired

Pedro Cachin

LostRank #1328

Matos won · Retired · 1h 8m

1–1

Set 16–4

Set 20–6

Set 30–1

Rafael Matos

WinnerRank #975

Venue

Club Tennis Vic

Vic, ESP· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

516 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 8m

0Aces3

5Double faults4

25Service points won25

9Service games played8

3Service games won5

8Return games played9

5/1145%Break points saved40%2/5

3/560%Break points converted55%6/11

Head to head

0Cachin

1Matos

1 meeting

VicFinal · 21 May 2017ClayThis match
Rafael Matos
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Pedro Cachin
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 0
Pedro Cachin · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pedro Cachin vs Rafael Matos, Vic 2017, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research