Jules Okala vs Ivan Davydov, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 19 May

Final

Jules Okala

WinnerRank #1885

Okala won in 2 sets · 1h 20m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–2

Ivan Davydov

LostRank #1612

Venue

Starlight Resort Hotel Tennis Center

Kızılağaç, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

12 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 20m

3Aces2

2Double faults3

42Service points won33

9Service games played9

9Service games won6

9Return games played9

6/6100%Break points saved67%6/9

3/933%Break points converted0%0/6

Head to head

1Okala

0Davydov

1 meeting

AntalyaQuarterfinal · 19 May 2017ClayThis match
Jules Okala
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ivan Davydov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jules Okala vs Ivan Davydov, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research