Dennis Nevolo vs Facundo Mena, Tampa 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 5 May

Final

Dennis Nevolo

LostRank #1351

Mena won in 2 sets · 2h 0m

0–2

Set 16–7⁷

Set 25–7

Facundo Mena

WinnerRank #193

Venue

Harbour Island Athletic Club

Tampa, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

31 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

66%

Moderate

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

5 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 0m

0Aces4

1Double faults4

51Service points won48

12Service games played12

8Service games won9

12Return games played12

7/1164%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted36%4/11

Head to head

0Nevolo

1Mena

1 meeting

TampaQuarterfinal · 5 May 2017ClayThis match
Facundo Mena
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁹Set 2: 7
Dennis Nevolo
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁷Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dennis Nevolo vs Facundo Mena, Tampa 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research