Facundo Mena vs Ricardo Rodriguez, Tampa 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 4 May

Final

Facundo Mena

WinnerRank #198

Mena won in 2 sets · 2h 3m

2–0

Set 17–5

Set 26–4

Ricardo Rodriguez

LostRank #2148

Venue

Harbour Island Athletic Club

Tampa, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

5 m

Sea level

Match stats

2h 3m

3Aces0

2Double faults1

37Service points won35

11Service games played11

8Service games won6

11Return games played11

1/425%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

1Mena

0Rodriguez

1 meeting

TampaRound of 16 · 4 May 2017ClayThis match
Facundo Mena
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Ricardo Rodriguez
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Facundo Mena vs Ricardo Rodriguez, Tampa 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research