Lamine Ouahab vs Florent Diep, Hammamet 2017, Round of 16

Final

Lamine Ouahab

WinnerATP: 1520

Ouahab won in 3 sets · 2h 41m

2–1

Set 15–7

Set 26–4

Set 36–0

Florent Diep

LostATP: 1815

Hotel Sentido PheniciaHammamet, TUN

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

80.0Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

23°CWarm

12km/hLight

71%Humid

7mSea level

Match stats

2h 41m

1Aces1

2Double faults3

53Service points won54

14Service games played14

11Service games won8

14Return games played14

0/30%Break points saved57%8/14

6/1443%Break points converted100%3/3

Head to head

2Ouahab

0Diep

2 meetings

HammametRound of 16 · 4 May 2017ClayThis match
Lamine Ouahab
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Florent Diep
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
Bourg-en-BresseRound of 16 · 2012Clay
Lamine Ouahab
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Florent Diep
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lamine Ouahab vs Florent Diep, Hammamet 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research