Jiajun Zhang vs Xi Qi, Quanzhou Challenger 2017, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 18 Mar

Final

Jiajun Zhang

LostUnranked

Qi won in 2 sets · 38m

0–2

Set 10–6

Set 20–6

Xi Qi

WinnerRank #1844

Venue

Blossom Garden Tennis Center

Quanzhou, CHN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

6 km/h

Light

Humidity

86%

Very humid

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

140 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

38m

0Aces3

4Double faults1

18Service points won26

6Service games played6

0Service games won6

6Return games played6

5/1145%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted55%6/11

Head to head

0Zhang

1Qi

1 meeting

Quanzhou ChallengerQualifying R1 · 18 Mar 2017HardThis match
Xi Qi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jiajun Zhang
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jiajun Zhang vs Xi Qi, Quanzhou Challenger 2017, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research