Taro Daniel vs Joao Souza, Tigre Challenger 2017, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 17 Mar

Final

Taro Daniel

WinnerRank #179

Daniel won in 2 sets · 1h 14m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Joao Souza

LostRank #1306

Venue

Complejo Jeep Park

Benavidez, ARG· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

3 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 14m

1Aces3

3Double faults1

34Service points won23

9Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played9

2/367%Break points saved33%2/6

4/667%Break points converted33%1/3

Head to head

1Daniel

0Souza

1 meeting

Tigre ChallengerQuarterfinal · 17 Mar 2017HardThis match
Taro Daniel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Joao Souza
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Taro Daniel vs Joao Souza, Tigre Challenger 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research