Jose Rubin Statham vs Kazuma Kawachi, Canberra 2017, Round of 16

Final

Jose Rubin Statham

WinnerATP: 1038

Statham won in 2 sets · 1h 9m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Kazuma Kawachi

LostATP: 1888

Canberra Tennis CentreCanberra, AUS

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

94.2Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

25°CWarm

24km/hModerate

76%Humid

577mModerate

Match stats

1h 9m

4Aces1

1Double faults4

31Service points won19

7Service games played6

7Service games won1

6Return games played7

4/4100%Break points saved55%6/11

5/1145%Break points converted0%0/4

Head to head

2Statham

0Kawachi

2 meetings

CanberraRound of 16 · 15 Mar 2017ClayThis match
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kazuma Kawachi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
AnseongRound of 32 · 2014Clay
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kazuma Kawachi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jose Rubin Statham vs Kazuma Kawachi, Canberra 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research