Julian Lenz vs Tommy Paul, Orlando 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 3 Mar

Final

Julian Lenz

LostRank #864

Paul won in 3 sets · 1h 34m

1–2

Set 11–6

Set 26–1

Set 31–6

Tommy Paul

WinnerRank #14

Venue

USTA National Campus

Orlando, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

26 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

53%

Moderate

Temperature

22°C

Warm

Altitude

33 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 34m

1Aces2

4Double faults7

32Service points won38

11Service games played10

5Service games won7

10Return games played11

2/825%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted75%6/8

Head to head

0Lenz

1Paul

1 meeting

OrlandoQuarterfinal · 3 Mar 2017ClayThis match
Tommy Paul
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Julian Lenz
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Julian Lenz vs Tommy Paul, Orlando 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research