N Sriram Balaji vs Haadin Bava, Chandigarh 2017, Semifinal

Final

N Sriram Balaji

WinnerATP: 1303

Balaji won in 2 sets · 1h 33m

2–0

Set 17–6⁴

Set 26–4

Haadin Bava

LostATP: 1975

CLTA Tennis Stadium, Sector 10Chandigarh, IND

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

96.2Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

26°CWarm

22km/hModerate

67%Moderate

351mModerate

Match stats

1h 33m

9Aces2

2Double faults0

44Service points won45

11Service games played11

9Service games won8

11Return games played11

3/560%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted40%2/5

Head to head

1Balaji

1Bava

2 meetings

ChandigarhSemifinal · 17 Feb 2017HardThis match
N Sriram Balaji
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Haadin Bava
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 4
JassowalRound of 32 · 10 May 2016Hard
Haadin Bava
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
N Sriram Balaji
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

N Sriram Balaji vs Haadin Bava, Chandigarh 2017, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research