Matej Sabanov vs Robin Stanek, Aktobe 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 25 Jan

Final

Matej Sabanov

LostRank #1219

Stanek won in 3 sets · 2h 37m

1–2

Set 13–6

Set 26–4

Set 36–7²

Robin Stanek

WinnerRank #1316

Venue

KGU OSDYUSSH Tennis Centre

Aktobe, KAZ· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

221 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 37m

2Aces7

7Double faults3

66Service points won58

16Service games played15

11Service games won11

15Return games played16

17/2277%Break points saved64%7/11

4/1136%Break points converted23%5/22

Head to head

0Sabanov

1Stanek

1 meeting

AktobeRound of 16 · 25 Jan 2017HardThis match
Robin Stanek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷
Matej Sabanov
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6²

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matej Sabanov vs Robin Stanek, Aktobe 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research