Marc Sieber vs Liam Broady, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Sat 21 Jan

Final

Marc Sieber

LostRank #1609

Broady won in 3 sets · 2h 1m

1–2

Set 16–2

Set 24–6

Set 31–6

Liam Broady

WinnerRank #233

Venue

Hotel Kaya Belek

Belek, TUR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Match stats

2h 1m

2Aces5

3Double faults2

46Service points won50

12Service games played13

8Service games won10

13Return games played12

5/956%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted44%4/9

Head to head

0Sieber

1Broady

1 meeting

AntalyaQuarterfinal · 21 Jan 2017HardThis match
Liam Broady
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Marc Sieber
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marc Sieber vs Liam Broady, Antalya 2017, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research