Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Carl Soderlund, Los Angeles 2017, Final

FUTURES · Final · Hard · Sun 8 Jan

Final

Mackenzie Mcdonald

WinnerRank #229

Mcdonald won in 2 sets · 1h 2m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–0

Carl Soderlund

LostRank #1424

Venue

David X. Marks Tennis Stadium

Los Angeles, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

56 m

Low

Match stats

1h 2m

2Aces1

2Double faults2

28Service points won27

8Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played8

0/10%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted100%1/1

Head to head

1Mcdonald

0Soderlund

1 meeting

Los AngelesFinal · 8 Jan 2017HardThis match
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Carl Soderlund
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Carl Soderlund, Los Angeles 2017, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research