Andy Murray vs Gerald Melzer, Doha 2017, Round of 16

ATP 250 · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 4 Jan

Final

Andy Murray

WinnerRank #1601.0296%

Murray won in 2 sets · 2h 23m

2–0

Set 17–6⁶

Set 27–5

Gerald Melzer

LostRank #161022.734%

Venue

Khalifa International Tennis and Squash Complex

Doha, QAT· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

2.0vs last year

Wind

22 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 23m

10Aces2

0Double faults3

49Service points won57

12Service games played12

9Service games won8

12Return games played12

3/650%Break points saved71%10/14

4/1429%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Murray

0Melzer

1 meeting

DohaRound of 16 · 4 Jan 2017HardThis match
Andy Murray
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 7
Gerald Melzer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andy Murray vs Gerald Melzer, Doha 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research