Andre Miele vs Esteban Bruna, Talca 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 14 Dec

Final

Andre Miele

LostRank #1656

Bruna won in 3 sets · 4h 0m

1–2

Set 17–5

Set 26–7⁵

Set 34–6

Esteban Bruna

WinnerRank #2028

Venue

Club de Tenis Talca

Talca, CHI· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

88 m

Low

Match stats

4h 0m

3Aces3

2Double faults3

70Service points won64

17Service games played17

10Service games won10

17Return games played17

8/1553%Break points saved53%8/15

7/1547%Break points converted47%7/15

Head to head

0Miele

1Bruna

1 meeting

TalcaRound of 16 · 14 Dec 2016ClayThis match
Esteban Bruna
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Andre Miele
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andre Miele vs Esteban Bruna, Talca 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research